Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from September, 2026

NABL 136 Diagnostic X-Ray QA Testing 2026: Accreditation, AERB Requirements and Test Parameters

Diagnostic radiology quality assurance NABL 136 Diagnostic X-Ray QA Testing 2026: Accreditation, AERB Requirements and Test Parameters Updated: 13 September 2026 Short answer: NABL 136 is the specific-criteria document for accreditation of Quality Assurance Testing Facilities that test diagnostic radiology X-ray equipment. The current NABL register lists Issue 02 dated 24 August 2021 with Amendment 01 dated 4 April 2025, which remains the current published version in September 2026. The criteria supplement ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and cover QA work including type-approval demonstration, manufacturer-premise testing, acceptance testing, periodic QA and QA after major repair, servicing or maintenance. AERB separately requires periodic QA of diagnostic X-ray equipment and currently states that routine QA should be carried out at least once every two years and after repairs with radiation-safety implications. Diagnostic X-ray quality assurance is not only an...

NABL 138 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment Calibration 2026: Gas Analyzers, PM Monitors and Traceability

Air-quality metrology and calibration NABL 138 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment Calibration 2026: Gas Analyzers, PM Monitors and Traceability Updated: 13 September 2026 Short answer: NABL 138 is the specific-criteria document for calibration laboratories working on air-quality monitoring equipment. The current NABL register lists Issue 01 with Amendment 02 dated 3 November 2025, which remains the current published version in September 2026. It covers gas analyzers such as NOx, CO, SO2, O3, NH3 and benzene analyzers, along with PM2.5 and PM10 analyzers. The criteria require traceable reference standards, controlled dilution or calibration systems, suitable reference equipment and ISO/IEC 17025 laboratory competence. Air-quality data can influence public-health information, pollution-control decisions, industrial compliance and environmental policy. But an air-quality monitoring station does not measure pollution simply because a number a...

NABL Software and IT System Testing Laboratory Accreditation 2026: AI, Cybersecurity, VAPT and ISO 17025

Software, AI and cybersecurity accreditation NABL Software and IT System Testing Laboratory Accreditation 2026: AI, Cybersecurity, VAPT and ISO 17025 Updated: 13 September 2026 Short answer: NABL amended NABL 137, "Specific Criteria for Accreditation of Software & IT System Testing Laboratories", on 28 April 2026. The current criteria apply with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and explicitly cover areas including AI/ML and large language models, IoT, blockchain, embedded systems, medical software, cybersecurity, VAPT, cloud security, interoperability, secure coding and software performance. The laboratory must demonstrate not only software-testing skill, but also controlled test environments, competent personnel, validated methods, configuration-managed test tools, secure handling and reliable test records. Software testing is increasingly becoming a conformity-assessment problem. A modern software product may control a medical device, ...

NABL Integrated Assessment 2026: How Testing Labs Should Prepare for Regulatory Body Requirements

Regulatory laboratory accreditation NABL Integrated Assessment 2026: How Testing Labs Should Prepare for Regulatory Body Requirements Updated: 13 September 2026 Short answer: NABL's integrated assessment programme provides a unified route in which testing-laboratory accreditation and the additional requirements of participating regulatory bodies can be assessed together. In August 2026 NABL amended NABL 127, the procedure for integrated assessment and regulator additional requirements, to Amendment 05, and NABL 154, the application form for integrated assessment of testing laboratories, to Amendment 07. Laboratories should therefore prepare against both ISO/IEC 17025 and the specific requirements of every regulator relevant to the scope they are seeking. A testing laboratory can be technically competent and still fail to satisfy a regulator-specific approval requirement. The reverse can also be risky. A laboratory may understand a re...