Skip to main content

Instrument Failure or Process Drift? A Practical Investigation

Calibration Troubleshooting

Use measurement history, independent checks, process evidence, and calibration data to separate instrument problems from process drift.

Is the instrument failing, or is the manufacturing process changing?

A measurement trend changes over time, but the reason isn't always clear.

The instrument might be changing. The manufacturing process could also be altering. Additionally, the measurement method may influence the results.

Start with the measurement trend.

    Begin by reviewing recorded measurements.

    Look at results over time to find a meaningful pattern. Check for:

  • Changes in measured values

  • Steady movement in one direction

  • Unexpected shifts

  • Variations around known production events

  • Discrepancies between measurement periods

  • One unusual measurement does not establish that an instrument or manufacturing process has changed.

A repeated pattern gives you a better basis for deciding what to investigate next.

Check the measurement system.

    Before weighing a measurement trend as process drift, check the measurement system.

  • Confirm instrument recognition

  • Verify calibration status.
  • Review calibration results.
  • Review intermediate checks where applicable.
  • Inspect the instrument condition.
  • Review the measurement method.
  • Check relevant environmental conditions.

Also check whether the measurement setup or procedure changed during the period being investigated.

A change in the measurement system can appear as a change in the production process when the two are not separated.

For a broader investigation, start with:

Your Instrument Is Calibrated. Why Can the Measurement Still Be Wrong?

Compare measurement and process data.

After reviewing the measurement system, compare records with relevant production data.

Depending on the process, this may include:

  • Equipment settings
  • Tooling changes
  • Maintenance activity
  • Material changes
  • Process adjustments
  • Production events

Look for a documented link between measurement changes and process events.

A relationship doesn't confirm causation but highlights areas needing more investigation.

Use controlled checks.

More measurements can help tell apart differences in the measurement system and the item being measured.    

Depending on the measurement method, useful checks may include:

  • Repeating the measurement
  • Using a suitable reference item
  • Comparing another instrument
  • Repeating the measurement under controlled conditions

The comparison method needs to be appropriate for the instrument and application.

Don't change many variables at once if you want to find out why a measurement changed. Record what changed and the results.

Do not assume the cause.

It's easy to label a changing measurement as “instrument drift” or “process drift.”

However, the evidence may not support either claim yet.

A trend can change because of:

  • Instrument condition

  • Measurement method

  • Environmental factors

  • The item measured

  • The manufacturing process

Keep these options separate. Wait for the records to give enough evidence to guide the investigation.

Decide what needs correction.


Corrective action should follow the evidence.

If the investigation finds an issue with the measuring instrument, then follow the correct equipment or calibration steps.

If the evidence indicates a manufacturing process issue, investigate that process.

If both are possible, gather more evidence before concluding the investigation.

Do not use recalibration as a substitute for investigating production changes. Recalibration only addresses the instrument or measurement system, not a separate manufacturing issue.

Investigation checklist


  1. Gather available measurement records.

  2. Review measurements over time.

  3. Look for repeated changes, not just one unusual result.

  4. Confirm instrument identification.

  5. Check calibration status.

  6. Review calibration results.

  7. Review intermediate checks, if applicable.

  8. Check the measurement method and setup.

  9. Review relevant environmental conditions.

  10. Compare measurement records with production data.

  11. Identify any documented equipment, tooling, or process changes.

  12. Use controlled measurements where suitable.

  13. Document all evidence.

  14. Choose corrective actions based on findings.

Continue the investigation.


If recalibration is done but the measurement issue continues, check: "The Instrument Was Recalibrated, but the Measurement Problem Remains."

Check calibration records against production trends. Ask: "Can Calibration Data Reveal a Manufacturing Process Problem?"

If two calibrated instruments show different readings, note: "Two Calibrated Instruments Give Different Readings. Which One Should You Trust?"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vernier Caliper Calibration Procedure, Error and Uncertainty

Dimensional Calibration Review caliper calibration for external, internal, depth, and step measurements, including reference standards, error, repeatability, and uncertainty. Contents What Is Vernier Caliper Calibration? Why Does Vernier Caliper Calibration Matter? Vernier Caliper Types Covered by Calibration Current Indian Standard for Vernier Calipers What Is Checked During Vernier Caliper Calibration? Vernier Caliper Calibration Procedure: Step by Step External, Internal and Depth Measurements Measurement Uncertainty in Vernier Caliper Calibration What Should a Vernier Caliper Calibration Certificate Contain? What Does Calibration Traceability Mean? NABL Vernier Caliper Calibration: What Should You Verify? How to Read a Vernier Caliper Calibration Certificate Dimensional Metrology •  India This guide explains what is checked during Vernier caliper calibration, what a calibration certificate should contain, and how to assess a laboratory's technical scope. Key p...

Pipette Calibration Checks Before Trusting Dispensed Volume

Mass Balance and Volume Review pipette identity, selected volume, tips, test method, environment, balance, results, uncertainty and decision rule before trusting a dispensed volume. Contents Direct answer Calibration, routine testing and adjustment Identify the complete pipetting system Confirm the measurement method Control the balance, liquid and environment Read systematic and random effects separately Apply the correct acceptance requirement Review the calibration certificate Build a useful routine check Direct answer A calibration check label does not set up that every quantity brought with the aid of a pipette is suitable for every method. Consider the result only after confirming the pipette configuration, decided on test volumes, recommendations, measurement approach, environmental controls, dimension uncertainty and attractiveness requirement. ISO 8655-2:2022 covers me...

Dimensional Calibration for Manufacturing and Quality Teams

Dimensional Calibration Build a dimensional calibration plan around intended use, suitable references, environmental control, test points, uncertainty, records, and result review. Contents Dimensional Calibration: A Practical Guide to Dimensional Measurement What Is Dimensional Calibration? Why Is Dimensional Measurement Important? What Is Dimensional Measurement? Common Dimensional Measuring Instruments How Does Dimensional Measurement Work? Dimensional Measurement Procedure Why Measurement Direction and Alignment Matter Why Temperature Matters in Dimensional Measurement Factors That Can Affect Dimensional Measurement How Is Dimensional Calibration Performed? Calibration and Verification of Dimensional Instruments Dimensional Metrology & Calibration Guide Dimensional Calibration: A Practical Guide to Dimensional Measurement Understand how dimensional measurements are made, what can influence them, how calibration is performed, and what to check before selecting a...